Tip for August 2019<\/span><\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n We\u2019ve studied the effect that adoption of a regulatory risk management (\u201cRRM\u201d) system has on enterprises that sponsor ERISA plans.<\/strong><\/p>\n The most effective benefit plan committees approach fiduciary risk based on the results sought, not derived from old methods with which they were most comfortable but are out of date.<\/p>\n Simply, the best fiduciary risk management designs originate backward from the outcomes sought.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n There are two prevalent design approaches on which RRMs are constructed. We call them “Features Focused<\/em>” and “Results Focused<\/em>.” The former takes a passive approach, while the latter is a prudent proactive approach.<\/strong><\/p>\n[table \u201c31\u201d not found \/] Emerging results of plan designs appearing in lawsuits and regulators\u2019 enforcement reports reveal the imprudence of the Features Focused approach.<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n TIP<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n The employee benefit plan risk controls, specifically the internal standards for meeting ERISA\u2019s fiduciary constraints, should be deduced from the results sought not driven by the providers of outsourced plan level services.<\/strong><\/p>\n It’s never too late to upgrade your plan’s design to meet current fiduciary standards of care. Roland|Criss offers a cost effective proven assessment and upgrade program that does so.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n